X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:38:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.62] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.4) with ESMTP id 4164065 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:14:48 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.62; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=IvyPRdu5kK5EvWpQ9lFI8ErFtDeRkAQmWYNfrII9j/x7p1PBce80isG/mRwGhByo; h=Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:thread-index:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.173.71.128] (helo=DELL8300) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NqFvi-0000RV-6C for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:14:14 -0500 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: Filler X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:14:50 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01CAC218.49E0E6C0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 thread-index: AcrCR+OSm4eUIFwfTy+XRGb0K/MKAgAAk1Ug X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 In-Reply-To: X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c260961f8309c37c9f5fc053d3101d52bbbd3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.173.71.128 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CAC218.49E0E6C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This has been discussed before but I want to make sure I'm not going to be sorry for using Evercoat metal glaze to solve the pinhole problem. Any experience out there with this stuff? It is POLYESTER finishing and blending putty. Boy does it work good on a sample. NO PINHOLES ! Jim ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CAC218.49E0E6C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This has been discussed before but I = want to make sure I’m not going to be sorry for using Evercoat metal = glaze to solve the pinhole problem. Any experience out there with this = stuff?

It is POLYESTER finishing and = blending putty. Boy does it work good on a sample. NO PINHOLES = !

Jim

------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CAC218.49E0E6C0--