I turbo’d my 360 originally. I started flying it with the turbo
(angle valve 360) and ultimately removed the turbo. It worked, and no heat
problems, but it just didn’t add much other than complexity and $. I also didn’t
like stuffing a canula up my nose for every flight. The turbo added about 50
lbs, $20,000 and 600 hours to the build… you be the judge!
Matt
From: Lancair Mailing
List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Dan & Kari Olsen
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:14 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Turbo-normalized 320 or 360?
LML
Gang,
I
would like to hear from anyone in the LML community who has experience (good or
bad) with running a turbo-normalized Lycoming IO-320 or IO-360 in their
Lancair. My mission is to fly in the mid to upper teens on long cross
countries and I would really like to get a bit more power up there than my
stock IO-320 is able to deliver. I am not after significantly higher
speeds but would really like to have better climb performance up there and more
ability to counter some of the mountain wave downdrafts we experience here over
the plains of Eastern Colorado.
Specific
types of information I’m interested in at this point include:
- Specific model of engine you are
running
- Which turbo system do you have?
- Operational issues?
- Maintenance / reliability issues?
- Electronic ignition vs. mags?
- Do you think it was worth it for
you? Why or why not?
Thanks!
Dan
Olsen
N320DK
Fort
Collins, CO