Return-Path: Received: from imo17.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.7]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:45:32 -0400 Received: from BOBPAS26@aol.com by imo17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id k.77.2de393b (3846); Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:42:20 -0400 (EDT) From: BOBPAS26@aol.com Message-ID: <77.2de393b.26230a0c@aol.com> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:42:20 EDT Subject: IV-P Hydraulics To: lancair.list@olsusa.com CC: 103323.3044@compuserve.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Dear Builders, While in Colorado Springs last month, I had a chance to crawl all over and fly John Wright's beautiful IV-P. A well built plane that truly motivated me to press on at full speed to complete something half as good. John was also infinitely patient with my many questions, and allowed me to photograph the details of construction and innovative techniques he used. A really positive experience and morale boost! Almost concurrently, my teamming partner Jim White arranged for us to visit an in-progress project at Lakeland. This one is probably 6-8 months ahead of our own IV-P's and gave us another invaluable look at what was expected. The fellow who said a picture was worth a thousand words underestimated the value in this case! Thanks to the gift of a digital camera from my wife, we now have over a hundred pictures of what a Lancair looks like in "undress." Probably more offensive to non-builders than a full collection of baby pictures, but truly compelling to Jim and me. I'm sure that the two visits, with "documentation," will save us hundreds of hours in our projects. (To quote from a sage builder in Florida, "The things we've done really well on this project have been done at least twice.") Our new Florida friends plan to relocate the hydraulic pump and resevior forward to the left side of the fuselage, opposite the accumulator on the right side. This idea is appealing to us as it moves considerable weight about two feet forward, shortens the run of hydraulic lines and provides limited access and servicing through the gear door without removing panels. Main disadvantage is that it occupies the left side of the forward "bucket" of the luggage compartment--a space my wife already refers to as "useless as a hat rack." I figure she won't notice the difference anyway! Jim and I agreed at the start of our projects that we weren't going to re-think the engineering, and would stick to the plans as closely as possible, but moving the hydraulic pack forward to either the left or right side (over the accumulator) of the fuselage is really appealing. We'd surely appreciate any thoughts/comments on this. Recognizing the great variation in individual planes, does anyone have a good generic weight and balance spread sheet that we could use to estimate the impact/folly of this change? Bob Pastusek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>