X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:19:10 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.1) with ESMTP id 2848451 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:28:26 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.63; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=mjGh76xgmrIPT6hFbYjaVBgJyAYy3gly4EoyZBoBVX8jmxN/1d6m5hTN83tttj+b; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index:Message-ID:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [64.91.214.194] (helo=DELL8300) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JliOB-0008Rj-Eu for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:27:47 -0400 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: West Microlight System X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:29:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01C89EB9.AB188B70" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcierAs6LXXYam1BSjuQSJbHK3tM/AAN0fsg X-Original-Message-ID: X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c2609687bc2dc7369c1fc2d2b25e0da2af3fc667c3043c0873f7e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 64.91.214.194 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C89EB9.AB188B70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Great Mike. I really like the way it spreads. Seems like fewer pinholes. Damn holes. I'll keep trucking on with West Systems stuff and using micro too in places. Jim _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of MikeEasley@aol.com Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 10:52 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: West Microlight System Jim, Other than it's much more expensive than micro, I don't see a downside. It absorbs the resin much more quickly so mixing is much easier. And sands very well. I used quite a bit of it on my ES. I also used West System epoxy for most of my body work instead of Jeffco. Mike Easley Colorado Springs ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C89EB9.AB188B70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Great Mike. I really like the way it spreads. Seems like fewer pinholes. Damn holes.

I’ll keep trucking on with = West Systems stuff and using micro too in places.

Jim

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of MikeEasley@aol.com
Sent: Monday, April 14, = 2008 10:52 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: West = Microlight System

Jim,

Other than it's much more = expensive than micro, I don't see a downside. It absorbs the resin much = more quickly so mixing is much easier. And sands very well. I = used quite a bit of it on my ES. I also used West System epoxy for most of my = body work instead of Jeffco.

Mike Easley

Colorado Springs

------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C89EB9.AB188B70--