Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #42498
From: bob mackey <n103md@yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: What's better than a Continental IO-550 fuel system?
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:36:41 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

I wrote:
If I needed a big 6-cylinder engine for my aircraft, I would not
choose a fuel-injected Continental.<<

George Braly asks:
So which large bore six cylinder engine would you select - - and why
do you think it is "better" ?


I have not been shopping for a 6-cylinder engine. I have been reading
what Lancair builders have to say about theirs. For reasons that have
been thoroughly discussed already, I am convinced that the Continental
fuel-injection system is a bad design. If I were shopping for an engine
for my Legacy / LIV / LIVP, I would consider...

a) Continental (T)IO-550 with a separate fuel-pressure regulation system
  so that flawed system only has to deal with one fuel pressure.
  Better because I can leave the fuel pump running and not have the
  engine quit.

b) Continental xO-550 (where x is some fuel delivery system other
  than the stock Continental). Better because the fuel mixture
  is determined by the fuel need (e.g. MAP and RPM).

c) Lycoming IO-540, which has a fuel injection system that is more
  closely based on right parameters.
  Better because it is readily available, fits the space, and has
  a fuel injection system that doesn't suck as badly.

d) Some other ~300 HP engine... possibly a Subaru H-6 with a
  turbo or supercharger. That would be an adaptation of the
  Eggenfellner Subaru package for the RV-10. Better because
  it has much better fuel flow control, is smoother, and is
  less expensive,  but is electricity dependent and heavy.

e) Maybe by the time I build a bigger Lancair, there will be a
  good firewall-forward package based on the Chevy LS series
  aluminum V8 engines. Better? I don't know.

If I were building an aircraft that needed an engine in this range,
those are the choices I would consider initially. With further
research something else might appear better.

George - I applaud all that you have done to improve fuel economy,
the fuel distribution in aircraft engines, and to improve the state
of understanding among pilots and mechanics. PRISM is another step
in the right direction. Perhaps GAMI could profitably fit a better
injection system to a Continental engine and make it a better engine.



Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster