X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:31:25 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.46] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1350322 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:37:12 -0400 Received: from [192.168.111.2] ([70.19.74.145]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J4M006TUV5BCYW8@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:36:48 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:36:45 -0400 From: Kevin Kossi Subject: Re: [LML] Lancair IV-PT Crash & Exiting In-reply-to: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: What a great article. (No emphasis on EXPERIMENTAL). I just hate it when the Press makes it a point that a plane involved in an accident was experimental without any investigation as to weather the accident happened because it was experimental or not. Happy ending to a potentially bad situation. My question is, on the Legacy one of my fears is a hard landing and not being able to open the canopy; What are the thoughts on the custom openable windows made for the Legacy? It seams to me that structurally it is not a good idea, given the fact that the window is no longer part of the structure. I was thinking about keeping a battery Sawzall in the plane for an emergency exit! Kevin On Aug 26, 2006, at 10:49 AM, Rick Argente wrote: > Lancair IV-PT Crash in MT > > http://www.helenair.com/articles/2006/08/23/helena_top/ > a01082306_06.txt# > post > > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/