Return-path: From: PJHWFD@aol.com Full-name: PJHWFD Message-ID: <499.7984d2d.321848b5@aol.com> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:57:57 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy? To: colyncase@earthlink.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1155985077" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5125 -------------------------------1155985077 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Colyn These are both 50 ROP numbers which send my CHTs to 370-380 which is higher than I like especially for break in. The 10:1 pistons do give me lower peak egts as predicted. Greyhawk had an excellent point about lower fuel flows and if this does prove to be the case it maybe the silver lining especially LOP. The motor runs very well LOP but I'm still a little unsure of safe power settings with how ever many ponies I am really running. Peter Hebert N23PH LEG2/G pjhwfd@aol.com -------------------------------1155985077 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Colyn

These are both 50 ROP numbers which send my CHTs to 370-380 which is hi= gher than I like especially for break in. The 10:1 pistons do give me=20= lower peak egts as predicted. Greyhawk had an excellent point about lo= wer fuel flows and if this does prove to be the case it maybe the silver lin= ing especially LOP. The motor runs very well LOP but I'm still a littl= e unsure of safe power settings with how ever many ponies I am really runnin= g.

Peter Hebert
N23PH LEG2/G
pjhwfd@aol.com

-------------------------------1155985077--