Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:27:28 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1236986@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=72.22.69.104; envelope-from=bjburr@mwheli.com
Reply-To: <bjburr@mwheli.com>
From: <bjburr@mwheli.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Avionics Questions
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-1236727@logan.com>

Alan,
In speaking with Jordan Bach at D2A 2 days ago he has not been able to
get the SL40 to interface with the Chelton for frequency selection.  The
SL30 works just fine.  So, my assumption is that it doesn't work.
Perhaps there is some incorrect connection but I think Jordan is the
expert in these interfaces.

Bryan
N132BB

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
Alan K. Adamson
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 8:11 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Avionics Questions


Posted for <bjburr@mwheli.com>:

  John,

<<<
  4)  Would you choose Garmin SL 30's or 40's and why?
>>>
  4.	The Garmin SL30 will allow for the selection of frequencies
  directly from the Chelton.  The SL40 will not.
  
Is that a true statement?  I guess I've never asked, but I thought the
Cheltons would control either the SL30 or the SL40?

I guess I'll go ask the source :)

Alan


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/