Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c3)
  with HTTP id 829385 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:15:34 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Alternative Engines
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c3
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:15:34 -0500
Message-ID: <web-829385@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E3B5908@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
References: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E3B5908@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com>:

  Will,
  
  It is not my new engine.  It is a design I developed 15 years ago and it is
still just that.  My confidence level that it is the "right design" has
increased exponentially since then.
  
  Right now I am covered up with several engineering projects.  In order to do
the engine now,  I would simply have to have the resources to hire some good
people and "direct" the project.  I could not do it personally at the present
time.
  
  But... yes,  it would easily run to rated power under hot day certification
conditions on unleaded Avgas.
  
  PLEASE - - PLEASE keep in mind that there is a HUGE difference between
premiuum  92 or 93 (R+M)/2  auto gas and  100LL with the lead removed (AKA
  Unleaded AVGAS).
  
  Regards,  Georoge
  
>Can you say anymore about your new generation aircraft engine? 
> Would it run on unleaded premium automotive gas?