Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:33:10 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-763546@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <jschroeder@perigee.net>
Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 763407 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:08:48 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net
Received: from john-study.home_wireless (dsl-208-26-41-107.perigee.net [208.26.41.107])
	by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1SL83c9017607
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:08:03 -0500
X-Original-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:08:12 -0500
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: FADEC Rough idle explanation
References: <list-762645@logan.com>
From: "John Schroeder" <jschroeder@perigee.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Message-ID: <opsmxebyq7oo3lez@john-study.home_wireless>
In-Reply-To: <list-762645@logan.com>
User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3929)

Walter -

What temps/parameters do you lean to on the ground.

Is it a different technique that at altitude for cruise?

Thanks,

John

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:11:19 -0500, Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>  
wrote:

>  4) Your comment about ground leaning is an interesting array of issues.
>  After start-up, I aggressively ground lean and do not again touch the
>  mixture until takeoff power is applied.  I do the run-up aggressively  
> leaned as it is more diagnostic.  Any other procedure is overly complex  
> and
> sub-optimal in my view.  I find my procedure optimal and no workload at   
> all.



--