Return-Path: Received: from imo29.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.73]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 18 May 1999 08:18:06 -0400 Received: from N295VV@aol.com (3957) by imo29.mx.aol.com (IMOv20) id kYUCa04196 for ; Tue, 18 May 1999 08:19:50 -0400 (EDT) From: N295VV@aol.com Message-ID: <59d9d201.2472b4e5@aol.com> Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 08:19:49 EDT Subject: Re: Communications To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> From: n295vv I use the "experimental Lancair two niner five victor victor" when I talk, primarily because the controllers are prone to respond "Lance" if they are not told it is an exp. Since my approach speed is much higher than a Lance, I prefer that they know the correct type of plane, but sometimes they still think it is a Lance even when I use the exp prefix Brent has correctly pointed out that the rules specify use of the experimental designation in the report. David Jones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html