Return-Path: Received: from socrates.uss.net ([209.100.88.12]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 4 May 1999 15:31:33 -0400 Received: from uss.net ([209.100.89.135]) by socrates.uss.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a ID# 0-34205U5000L100S0) with ESMTP id AAA1181 for ; Tue, 4 May 1999 14:26:45 -0500 Message-ID: <372F4C41.77B21E55@uss.net> Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 14:36:34 -0500 From: William Balfanz To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: Access panel latches References: <19990504045307.AAA18550@truman.olsusa.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> The latch you're referring to is also known as a Hartwell latch (ACS P.443) and is in fact the same one commonly used on access doors. I plan to use a pair of them for oil dipstick access. For larger panels at the speeds we will be flying, I'd feel better using a more positive retention system and therefore made my forward deck removable using the recommended piano hinge method. My hinge wires are accessible with the instrument panel and glareshield in place and I just use a short twist of safety wire to secure them. Bill [My forward deck is removable via the piano hinge method as well, although I've chosen to keep the pins in place by welding their very aft ends into short 1/4-20 SS bolts which [will] thread into nuts affixed to the deck inline with the hinges. I don't want to have to remove the deck just to check the batteries and hydraulics so have opted for the access panels. Should make preflights a bit more complete and easier to perform. Anyway, I assume the 'Hartwell' latches will be sufficient ('98-'99 ACS catalog, p 488, BTW), as they seem to have pretty wide acceptance on certificated aircraft. Thanks for your input. ] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html