Return-Path: Received: from hil-img-7.compuserve.com ([149.174.177.137]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 3 May 1999 09:08:18 -0400 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by hil-img-7.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.18) id JAA09361 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Mon, 3 May 1999 09:10:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 09:10:30 -0400 From: Rick Argente Subject: Chipped Brake Lining: Cleveland or Matco Sender: Rick Argente To: "INTERNET:lancair.list@olsusa.com" Message-ID: <199905030910_MC2-7445-E6C@compuserve.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> So far, I have a total of 4 hours on my Lancair 360. After the last flight, I checked the brake lining and discovered that three of the four brake linings had chipped. I am able to see one of the rivets on all of the three pads. These pads are the original pads I reveived witht the kit, dating back to November of 1992. Anybody else here had a similar problem? Could it be that these older pads had become britlle over time? I will order new ones immediately and will ground the plane until the new ones are installed. Sometime ago, somebody here mentioned we can use Cleveland pads (part number 66-106 (66-2)) instead of the Matco ones. Are the Cleveland pads suppose to be better? Please advice, thank you. Rick Argente N360ZR PS Aside from the above, the flight testing is going very well. I was able to fly her for about two hours yesterday and all gauges were well within the green. It flys like it's on rails! Absolutely incredible visibility. More on flight testing later... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html