Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:56:28 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m04.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 1980053 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:51:02 -0500 Received: from Billhogarty@aol.com by imo-m04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.12d.1fb7909a (14374) for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:50:53 -0500 (EST) From: Billhogarty@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <12d.1fb7909a.2b5053ed@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:50:53 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Wing Loading mysteries X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_12d.1fb7909a.2b5053ed_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10625 --part1_12d.1fb7909a.2b5053ed_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FWIW - Martin Hollman showed a film of the static load test on the L-IV wing during an EAA meeting at San Carlos back some time around 1995. If I remember correctly, the wing broke at around 12,000 lbs which I think was the basis to set the max G figure at +4. Bill Hogarty L-IVP @ 96% --part1_12d.1fb7909a.2b5053ed_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
FWIW -  Martin Hollman showed a film of the static load test on the
L-IV wing during an EAA meeting at San Carlos back some time around 1995. 

If I remember correctly, the wing broke at around 12,000 lbs which
I think was the basis to set the max G figure at +4. 
Bill Hogarty  L-IVP @ 96%

 --part1_12d.1fb7909a.2b5053ed_boundary--