|
|
I belive they are the same;power absorption,efficiency over various speed
ranges,and reliability.
Pre and post ingition oiling and lighter weight are additional advantages.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Sower" <canarder@frontiernet.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 9:46 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Electric Oil Pump?
There is an important rationale for EWP, involving power absorption,
efficiency
over various speed ranges, reliability, etc. that make EWP superior in so
many
ways to the system it was designed to replace. Oil pumps are so bullet
proof,
simple and reliable that I can't come up with a similar argument for an
EOP. I
am looking for a way in which EOP would constitute an improvement in
performance
and/or reliability over the current system and coming up empty.
Help me out here ... what would be the advantage? ... Jim S.
Eric Ruttan wrote:
> Having read of the demonstrated the effectivness of an electric water
pump
> (lighter weight even after a redundant instalation, less power consumed)
in
> our applications I have a question.
>
> I can find no discussion or anyone offering a simular product for oil
pumps.
>
> It would seem there is a direct correlation of advantage between the
> Electric Water Pump (EWP) and an Electric Oil Pump EOP?
>
> Have I missed an offering of such a product or did i miss a pitfall?
>
> To clarify I do not mean "pre oilers". I mean a full time EOP.
>
> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
--
Jim Sower ... Destiny's Plaything
Crossville, TN; Chapter 5
Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|