Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #7777
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Exhausts: 304 vs 321
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 14:24:38 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Scott,

   For an NA 13B I think 304 will work fine, 321 is somewhat better, but I
have 360 hours on my .101 wall (a bit thick wall) 304 and its still going
strong.  My personal comfort zone (not based on data) would go for a minimum
of 0.058" wall if using 304, perhaps .049" for  321.

Ed


Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott" <squiggles@yahoo.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 1:54 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Exhausts: 304 vs 321


Hello All...

This has probably been discussed many times over, but
I can't seem to find an answer in the archives to the
following...

For a NA 6 port, 13b, why choose 321 stainless steel
over 304 for the exhaust?  Or Inconel 625 over 321?

Is it a comfort level or a need?  Also, it seemed that
321 .035 was living on the edge and that most were
using in the .060+ range.  Is this the prevailing
wisdom?

Finally, is visually possible to determine what is 304
and what is 321?

I ask this as I am going over to a used parts race
shop and they just have a pile of exhaust pipe, no
rhyme or reason to the pile.  Thus, if it really
didn't matter on the SS alloy I could just pick the
pipes I needed and hack and slash as necessary.

Thanx!!!  Many thanks to all who posted pics of their
coils and water pump surgeries!!!!

-Scott





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover

>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster