Message-ID: <02bd01c42623$4911f140$2402a8c0@EDWARD>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-3178807@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Sun-100 Race Results
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:30:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I don't think it really matters the length of the course (80 NM), you
average speed is still going to be lower than your cruise race speed due to
take off and climb to race altitude at slower speeds.  I would agree that
the longer the course, the less impact the lesser takeoff and climb speed
will have on the average.    It would appear that with an average of 216 mph
and his fight with a head wind ( you never recover the time you lost going
into a headwind by going downwind on the next leg) there was a 4 MPH
different between his average (which includes the adverse effect of the wind
and take/off) and his race speed.

In any case Tracy's race speed of 220 mph with some power held in reserve
clearly speaks for itself.

Ed

Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Finn Lassen" <finn.lassen@verizon.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:57 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Sun-100 Race Results


> Ed Anderson wrote:
>
> >Mark is correct about the average ground speed 216.7 MPH, however, that
was
> >NOT Tracy's top speed, that includes the take off roll and climb which of
> >course lowers the average speed.
> >
> Not to diminish the results, but I believe the actual lenght of the
> course is between 80 and 90 miles, not 100 miles, thus compensating for
> the take off roll and climb. I could be wrong. Anybody know if the
> average speed is computed from actual length of course or from 100 miles?
>
> Finn
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>