Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 3178404 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 08:16:36 -0400 Received: from EDWARD (clt25-78-058.carolina.rr.com [24.25.78.58]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i3JCGXSn001355 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 08:16:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <00b401c42607$e2034c30$2402a8c0@EDWARD> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] FW: Ed's adjustable intake? Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 08:14:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Hi Rusty, Yes, got it back together just in time to fly it to Sun & Fun. However, given my history with unique problems, I did not adjust it while airborne 550 miles away from home and my tools. So I have not even begun testing. I plan to swap out the current lower manifold which I made for my first engine out of two slabs of aluminum as I know it has poor airflow characteristics. I used it simply because it was there and mainly wanted to test the mechanism for adjusting the intake length. So I am going to either find a better lower manifold or more likely I will have to have one made as my motor mount interferes with almost anything designed for the 13B engine. It turned out the tubes did have some bubbles in the plating, but I used a stiff wire brush wheel on a drill to remove all the bubbles and loose stuff. 99.9999 percent of the nickel bearing surface remained, so for my purposes the nickel plating worked fine - it just bothered the plater {:>). I ran it up and down at Sun & Fun for numerous folks, manage to leave my master switch on all night once as a results and had to get a jump start. I will report the results as usually good, bad or ugly once I start testing in earnest. However, after seeing Tracy Crook's VSTOL take off with the 2.85 and monster 75/88 prop, I decided that I want one {:>). So depending on timing, I might have to delay the intake testing a bit. By the way a Zinc coating is used to temporarily protect the aluminum from oxidation after the aluminum is cleaned, the nickel acid bath then removes the Zinc and coast the aluminum with Nickel. The nickel plating on the gear box still looks as new as the day it was done and does eliminate the sometimes ugly discoloration that aluminum plate will undergo after exposure to some environments. So I am happy with the results of Nickel plating aluminum. Next Year I expect to see you at Sun & Fun with Aircraft. After all, Finn has long enough basked in the attention of having the only rotary powered RV-3 - I presume that is why his aircraft is frequently the center of attention {:>) Ed. Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:14 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] FW: Ed's adjustable intake? > Greetings, > > Does anyone know if Ed actually flew his adjustable intake to SNF? It just > dawned on me (during class while dozing) that we never heard any further > testing reports, so I wonder if he ever managed to get it working with the > new zinc plating. > > Just curious, > Rusty (trying to stay awake) > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >