Return-Path: <crobinson@rfgonline.com>
Received: from border.rfgonline.com ([65.171.123.242] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 3173405 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:34:53 -0400
Received: (qmail 24049 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 21:30:06 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com) (192.168.150.101)
  by 192.168.150.1 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 21:30:06 -0400
Received: from rfgonline.com ([192.168.150.87]) by EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:34:53 -0400
Message-ID: <407F383D.5070705@rfgonline.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:34:53 -0400
From: Chad Robinson <crobinson@rfgonline.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Ed's adjustable intake?
References: <list-3173373@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-3173373@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: crobinson@rfgonline.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Apr 2004 01:34:53.0234 (UTC) FILETIME=[042A1120:01C42353]

Jack Beale wrote:
> 
>     Yes, he did...!  I spoke to him for quite awhile on Wednesday 
> afternoon; and, while there, Ed demonstrated his 'adjustable intake'.  
> Pretty impressive engineering job.  I believe the jury is still out on 
> the benefits...

I don't remember the original point. Did Ed intend to make this a permanent 
modification, or to gather performance data for a later, permanent decision 
with a fixed-length intake?

Regards,
Chad