Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from [209.114.234.2] (HELO IPOfCard1.guest-tek.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b2) with ESMTP id 3171185 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:19:22 -0400 Received: from USDCLES112NB160 ([198.18.1.149]) by IPOfCard1.guest-tek.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i3F26xu13843 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:06:59 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Performance Props Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:18:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Greetings all, Does anyone remember the message I sent a week or so ago, when I said I didn't want a wood prop? Well, forget that :-) After some further thought, and research, I've realized that it isn't likely that I'll get the kind of performance that I want from my Warp Drive prop. I can't help but notice that typical RV-3's, with far less power than I've got, are getting great performance with wooden props. At Tracy's recommendation, I called Performance Props, and had a long talk with them about my needs. They were quite confident that they could get me the performance I want, so much so, that I signed up for a prop. Unfortunately, I'm not scheduled to get a prop until around mid July, but that will give me time to clean up the airframe, and maybe even play with a 3rd intake. Performance Props makes the prop initially a little large at first, then you tell them how it works, and send it back for a final adjustment, and finish. I guess that means I need to get the engine and airframe finalized before testing the prop. Cheers, Rusty (got wood... oops, sorry)