Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3155419 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 00:12:37 -0400 Received: from Leonards ([68.111.228.182]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040410041225.PPFG16022.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@Leonards> for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 00:12:25 -0400 From: "David Leonard" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Dave's pump problems and Rotor Poll Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:12:30 -0700 Message-ID: <001e01c41eb2$0b07d090$b6e46f44@Leonards> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001F_01C41E77.5EA8F890" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C41E77.5EA8F890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Wow, I cannot believe you have room for that under the RV-3. It would never fit in my RV-6. Ok, I think you have convinced me, I will make the change. I can't see why my last one wouldn't work, but I have to try something. David Leonard The Rotary Roster: http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Russell Duffy Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 8:09 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Dave's pump problems and Rotor Poll Ok Rusty, now you have me a little confused. Your rev-2 upgrade seems a lot like my current system. A pressure cap (rev-2) at the rear side housing outlet (highest point in the system) is just like having a small tank there with a pressure cap on it (my current system). I would prefer not to make the change if you think there is nothing wrong with the current system and my problem lies elsewhere. To AST or not to AST, that is the question. Sorry Dave, I think I wasn't very clear about where my new pressure cap is. It's at the top of the water pump housing, as you can see in the pic. The way I had it in the rev-1 arrangement is actually more ideal, but I ruined it with some large loops of hose that tended to trap air. That's probably the only reason my rev-2 arrangement seems better. I would urge you to continue with your proposed change. Cheers, Rusty (AST's are never bad, if you have room for them) ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C41E77.5EA8F890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Wow, I cannot believe you have room = for that under the RV-3.  It would never fit in my = RV-6.

 

Ok, I think you have convinced me, = I will make the change.  I can’t see why my last one wouldn’t = work, but I have to try something.

 

David Leonard

The Rotary = Roster:

http://memb= ers.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Russell = Duffy
Sent: Friday, April 09, = 2004 8:09 PM
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Dave's pump problems and Rotor Poll

 

Ok Rusty, now you have me a little confused.  Your rev-2 upgrade seems a lot like my current = system.  A pressure cap (rev-2) at the rear side housing outlet (highest point in = the system) is just like having a small tank there with a pressure cap on it = (my current system).  I would prefer not to make the change if you = think there is nothing wrong with the current system and my problem lies = elsewhere.  To AST or not to AST, that is the question. 

 

Sorry Dave, I think I wasn't very = clear about where my new pressure cap is.  It's at the top of = the water pump housing, as you can see in the pic.  The way I had = it in the rev-1 arrangement is actually more ideal, but I ruined it = with some large loops of hose that tended to trap air.  That's probably = the only reason my rev-2 arrangement seems better.   I = would urge you to continue with your proposed change.

 

Cheers,

Rusty (AST's are never bad, if you = have room for them) 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C41E77.5EA8F890--