Return-Path: Received: from [216.52.245.18] (HELO ispwestemail1.mdeinc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3153692 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:05:35 -0400 Received: from 7n7z201 (unverified [67.136.145.237]) by ispwestemail1.mdeinc.com (Vircom SMTPRS 3.1.293.1) with SMTP id for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 20:05:31 -0700 Message-ID: <020101c41ddf$818d2540$df918843@7n7z201> From: "William" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: idle speeds Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 22:05:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Dave, I still suspect that you have an air bubble in the pump. If so, it *will not* pump or self prime based on my tests when I was measuring the flow. I had to get the pump under water to get it to pump, then it was like a firehose. Bill Schertz KIS Cruiser # 4045 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Leonard" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:17 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: idle speeds > Thanks Kelly, > > About 2 weeks ago I spent an entire day taking off my water pump just so > that I could check for such an error. I inspected it very carefully, > the two are indeed separate. But thanks for the input. Keep em coming. > > David Leonard > The Rotary Roster: > http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] > On > > Behalf Of keltro@att.net > > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 7:08 PM > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: idle speeds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the input rusty. You are very right about other eyes. > Every > > > interested pair of eyes on the field has taken a look including 2 > A&P > > and a > > > couple other rotary enthusiasts. There don't seem to be any > problems > > staring me > > > in the face. > > > > > > I don't have it on this computer, but I did post a pic of my pump. > > Nothing > > > special. I just lopped off the thermostat area from the first > coolant > > sensor > > > outward and had someone weld over the thermostat bypass then weld on > a > > plate to > > > which I bolt an AN-16 Fitting. This AN-16 fitting goes to the top > of > > the RAD. > > > An AN-20 fitting comes out of the bottom of the rad back up to the > pump > > intake. > > > > goes to the drain fitting on the bottom of the RAD. > > > > > > > Dave, > > > > Take a look at the attached photos of a modified thermostat > > housing. Make > > > > sure that the input and output sides of the housing were not left > open > > to each > > > > other when the housing was lopped off. If so coolent would just > > circulate in the > > > > pump (path of least resistance) instead of the engine and radiator. > > IMHO > > > > > > Kelly Troyer > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html