Return-Path: Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3153683 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 22:59:00 -0400 Received: (qmail 13956 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2004 02:58:55 -0000 Received: from 65-73-215-188.bras01.cok.tn.frontiernet.net (HELO frontiernet.net) ([65.73.215.188]) (envelope-sender ) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.18) with SMTP for ; 9 Apr 2004 02:58:55 -0000 Message-ID: <407611E2.D2CE2D3E@frontiernet.net> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 22:00:50 -0500 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Network abuse References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FWIW I don't often send attachments. When I do, it's by rearrangement or with accompanying text that's elaborate enough that it can't be faked. I don't get much spam (my ISP has a filter that I can set for any severity of inspection) but I get lots and LOTS of infected email. Norton picks all that up. Jim S. "Dale R." wrote: > Hi All, > > I was afraid of this. We have a spammer harvesting addresses > from our list archive. > > Just an hour after posting my first message from my new (to this > list) address, I started getting the same kind of spam that started > shortly after my last move from email.com to cox.net. In the > previous 10 months that I've had this address, I had never received > a single piece of SPAM. > > Also, I wonder if someone with Jim Sower's address has an infected > computer. I recieved a message, through the list, with no text - > just an attached file: C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\nsmailPU.gif > > I'm not on a computer I can put at risk, right now , so I haven't attempted to download and scan to see if it's legit. > > Sorry to take up list bandwidth this way, but it _could_ become > important. > > Dale R. > COZY MkIV-R #1254