Return-Path: Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3152908 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:40:11 -0400 Received: from user-33qt4bg.dialup.mindspring.com ([199.174.145.112] helo=Carol) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BBcZV-0000K4-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:40:10 -0700 Message-ID: <009a01c41d88$252f2160$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary engine Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 11:40:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 I have to agree with John on the quietness of the rotary with the turbo. I had his aircraft up to rotation speed, and I was amazed at the lack of noise. When we got back into the Lycoming powered Cozy, I was wondering if the exhaust stacks had fallen off. What a difference! The rotary with the turbo was significantly quieter than the Cozy with the Lycoming. Paul Conner ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Slade" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 5:31 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary engine > > I have to say, an my wife agrees, the turbo does not make a very good > > muffler. The loudness is on the very outside edge of what is tolerable. > That's interesting. I'm finding the opposite. In fact, I don't wear my > headset when taxiing because I can't hear the engine with it on. Half a > dozen people have commented that the engine sounds quieter than a Cessna. > I'm using a single stage stock '91 turbo. > John Slade > Cozy IV turbo rotary > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >