Return-Path: <Daveleonard@cox.net>
Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1)
  with ESMTP id 3151967 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:20:20 -0400
Received: from Leonards ([68.111.228.182]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.03.01 201-2131-111-101-20040311) with ESMTP
          id <20040408042020.HZHJ6566.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@Leonards>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:20:20 -0400
From: "David Leonard" <Daveleonard@cox.net>
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Rotary engine
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:20:22 -0700
Message-ID: <000101c41d20$cf12a0c0$b6e46f44@Leonards>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-3151816@logan.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

I have to say, an my wife agrees, the turbo does not make a very good
muffler.  The loudness is on the very outside edge of what is tolerable.

David Leonard
The Rotary Roster:
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html

> So now a year later and some progress, I am not worried about high
> altitude airports, or at least at this time, since in Florida, flat
lands
> is not a problem.  But then again, I am not building a velocity to
just
> fly LOCAL.  Just boosting a 13b and only to 200+ just sea level and
not
> normalizing it for higher alts (at this  time) and using the turbo as
a
> muffler.  Well another sun-n-fun and more discussions on to turbo or
not.
> Any rotary velocity going to sun-n-fun or the bar-b-que dinner?
> 
> Bob Kuc
>