Return-Path: Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3151780 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:42:52 -0400 Received: from [65.2.35.203] by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040408014251.VHUT1797.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[65.2.35.203]> for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 21:42:51 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:42:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Rotary engine From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3164218966_11928695" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3164218966_11928695 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 4/7/04 5:01 PM, "Bob Kuc" wrote: > I am still on the fence, but would like to decide what engine to use. I am > building a Large wing Velocity, not the XL. One of the original designers of > that version of the plane recommends that an io-540 250 horse would be the > ideal engine. Now I was thinking of either a 2 rotor that would be turboed to > 200+ hp at sl not at 10K or a NA 3 rotor. > > I would like to get a consensus of the better way to go? Suggestions? If I > have to, I could probably hang the exhaust out the cowl, or modify the cowl so > as to get some airflow over the exhaust to help cool it. > > Bob > > Bob, the turbo puts the exhaust exactly where you want it, acts as a very good muffler and you harvest the hot gasses for more power. I vote for13B Turbo. bulent --B_3164218966_11928695 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Rotary engine On 4/7/04 5:01 PM, &quo= t;Bob Kuc" <bkuc1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

I am still on the fence, but would like to decide what engine to use.  = ;I am building a Large wing Velocity, not the XL.  One of the original = designers of that version of the plane recommends that an  io-540 250 h= orse would be the ideal engine.  Now I was thinking of either a 2 rotor= that would be turboed to 200+ hp at sl not at 10K or a NA 3 rotor.
I would like to get a consensus of the better way= to go?  Suggestions?  If I have to, I could probably hang the exh= aust out the cowl, or modify the cowl so as to get some airflow over the exh= aust to help cool it.
Bob


Bob, the turbo puts the exhaust exactly where you want it, acts as a very g= ood muffler and you harvest the hot gasses for more power. I vote for13B Tur= bo.
bulent --B_3164218966_11928695--