Return-Path: Received: from tomcat.al.noaa.gov ([140.172.240.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3151582 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 19:15:40 -0400 Received: from PILEUS.al.noaa.gov (pileus.al.noaa.gov [140.172.241.195]) by tomcat.al.noaa.gov (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id i37NFdKa016388 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:15:39 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20040407170810.05cd4260@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov> X-Sender: bdube@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 17:14:44 -0600 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Bill Dube Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Rotary engine In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 05:01 PM 4/7/2004 -0400, you wrote: >I am still on the fence, but would like to decide what engine to use. I >am building a Large wing Velocity, not the XL. One of the original >designers of that version of the plane recommends that an io-540 250 >horse would be the ideal engine. Now I was thinking of either a 2 rotor >that would be turboed to 200+ hp at sl not at 10K or a NA 3 rotor. > It is likely that the new Mazda Renesis engine will put out 200+ HP without a turbo, but there is not one in the air, yet. Several folks are deep in the throws of installing these new style rotary engines, but they have yet to actually fly. It is a two-rotor that weighs slightly less than the 13b engine. There is always the 20b three-rotor engine....