Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3151585 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 19:08:29 -0400 Received: from BigAl ([68.107.116.221]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.01 201-2131-111-101-20040311) with ESMTP id <20040407230827.CIGI6468.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@BigAl> for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 19:08:27 -0400 From: "Al Gietzen" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Rotary engine Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 16:08:43 -0700 Message-ID: <001401c41cf5$45c8a880$6400a8c0@BigAl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0015_01C41CBA.9969D080" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C41CBA.9969D080 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [FlyRotary] Rotary engine =20 I am still on the fence, but would like to decide what engine to use. I = am building a Large wing Velocity, not the XL. One of the original = designers of that version of the plane recommends that an io-540 250 horse would = be the ideal engine. Now I was thinking of either a 2 rotor that would be turboed to 200+ hp at sl not at 10K or a NA 3 rotor. =20 Bob; =20 I was on that same fence for my SE RG four+ years ago; and opted for the = NA 20B. But that was before the Renesis. Now it seems clear to go with = turbo Renesis. It will give you maybe 230+ at sea level, no boost, and the = beauty is you can have that power at high altitude with the turbo. You can get = a new Renesis for the price of a used/overhauled 20B. =20 Al ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C41CBA.9969D080 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Subject: [FlyRotary] Rotary engine

I am still on the fence, = but would like to decide what engine to use. I am building a Large wing = Velocity, not the XL. One of the original designers of that version of the = plane recommends that an io-540 250 horse would be the ideal = engine. Now I was thinking of either a 2 rotor that would be turboed to 200+ hp at = sl not at 10K or a NA 3 rotor.

Bob;

I was on that same fence for my = SE RG four+ years ago; and opted for the NA 20B. But that was before the = Renesis. Now it seems clear to go with turbo Renesis. It will give you = maybe 230+ at sea level, no boost, and the beauty is you can have that power at = high altitude with the turbo. You can get a new Renesis for the price = of a used/overhauled 20B.

------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C41CBA.9969D080--