Return-Path: Received: from smtp5.netdoor.com ([208.137.128.159] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3145922 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 04 Apr 2004 23:06:41 -0400 Received: from netdoor.com (port963.jxn.netdoor.com [208.148.210.63]) by smtp5.netdoor.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i3536bCV028127 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2004 22:06:38 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4070CD37.20306@netdoor.com> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 22:06:31 -0500 From: Charlie & Tupper England Reply-To: cengland@netdoor.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: idle speeds References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) I agree with Jim about this. I've had similar problems with a Lyc powered RV-4. Anything over about 800 prop rpm caused a lot of float. I'd be interested to see the calculations on whether a really highly pitched cruise prop is producing thrust at 800-850 rpm & 60-70mph. I think that it's at least safe to say that the airflow isn't driving the prop disc & producing drag like a climb or c/s prop. I wonder what engine-stopped glide angle would look like compared to the angle we get used to while being pulled along by the engine on final. This could be a significant safety issue if there's an engine failure when we have become acclimated to unknowingly carrying power (thrust) on final. Charlie Jim Sower wrote: > <... I need to get the idle speed way down ...> > You sure do. I've regaled you several times about my EZ with an O-235 > idling at 800-900 rpm that could NEVER be slowed down enough to land - > floated 1000' or more down every damned runway I encountered. Landed > fine when I set the idle down to 500-600 rpm. Ran rough as a cob at > that speed on the ground (which is why it had been set so high), but I > could advance it to 800 for ground ops, and go to the idle stop on > final. With all your power, I would emphatically recommend that you > back the idle down till it will just barely idle on the ground. You > can always taxi above the idle stop, but you can never land below it. > I would also strongly recommend a shutdown switch (injectors? pumps?) > near the throttle quadrant for convenient shutdown on final. A > guarded switch (guarded ON) would satisfy safety considerations, and > be convenient enough that you could shut down nearly as easily as > pulling the mixture. > > That way, you have all the bases covered ... Jim S. > > > John Slade wrote: > >> Last week we had some discussion on idle speeds, and I think the >> consensus >> was to keep it around 2000 or a little under. Just for information >> for other >> canard pusher people, I think 2000 is going to be a real problem for >> me. At >> the current 1850 setting with the big 3 66/84 prop I have on she's >> pushing >> hard against the brakes. I think I could taxi the length of the >> runway at >> idle and be doing 30/40 kts at the end. On a short (3400) runway the >> only >> way to stop might be kill the engine once on the ground, or even on >> short >> final. So I need to get the idle speed way down. >> John Slade (more power than I know what to do with) >> >> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > -- > Jim Sower ... Destiny's Plaything > Crossville, TN; Chapter 5 > Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T > >