Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.netdoor.com ([208.137.128.154] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 3144651 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:28:42 -0500 Received: from netdoor.com (port753.jxn.netdoor.com [208.148.209.153]) by smtp1.netdoor.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i344SeGc009682 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 22:28:41 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <406F8EF3.2080908@netdoor.com> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 22:28:35 -0600 From: Charlie & Tupper England Reply-To: cengland@netdoor.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: solid state regulators?? was: Rusty's O2 / EM2 problems. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Speaking of fuel pressure regulators, is there anyone on the list that's been 'intimate' with the rumored electronic regulated fuel pumps in the newer cars? Are the regulators independent of the engine computer? I'm at the proseal stage of building my tanks, & the 'no return' option is attractive. Tracy, I'm familiar with your technique & understand its advantages. However, I'm going to have 4 tanks & with the no-return pumps I could do the entire fuel system with just one valve & no extra return lines. Thanks, Charlie