X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "William Jepson" Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.4) with ESMTPS id 7865980 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:34:58 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.192.170; envelope-from=wrjjrs@gmail.com Received: by pdbbh15 with SMTP id bh15so33429237pdb.1 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:34:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zdtqBRYtNuowH/WOLFDsM/av/Ojs0yDC3o1IaIboH3o=; b=vcbIMe7A/E/7VFqQpo9a8K3e7+Q1hcuXLouYp41m7jYJp+oqLRbn97aPZimr1Xj3lJ Ug9HfZASH+EL1eM1A13diXkUizRipMbgxMVHatWk7WVl8blHrfNseH5YCtovNKDEzq8P Vl5aV6yWxO6NzTN+gxYlIAa6k4sXzrsPI7GWICWRb5THUibE3p6FrHnUtnsc6SELxBlB z2s588qLeMowqbG1LcpFDDeel1c8bd1LjhP2dktUDHu3GR3WiK/7lOVRliSE3z2FAKZe 2GL5rY2xYM4t4aUngCt5AR83ZKePB1kgkpS5DVUjqADU4ZOIkH8zA/sBBIhAc5ssMDZS GfDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.46.161 with SMTP id w1mr42433702pdm.66.1437885263114; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.74.67 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.74.67 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:34:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:34:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Anyone or everyone in Oshkosh? To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfd055055f4c9051bbfc0bb --047d7bfd055055f4c9051bbfc0bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There are alternatives. Bill Jepson On Jul 25, 2015 8:35 PM, "Thomas Mann" wrote: > Well, barring the passage of the =E2=80=9CAffordable Airplane Act=E2=80= =9D perhaps we > should start trying to solve our own problems. > I don=E2=80=99t know what the transaction was regarding production of Tra= cy=E2=80=99s > design but if it=E2=80=99s based off of royalties for every unit sold, I = would say > that it=E2=80=99s not benefiting anyone. > > Perhaps a competitive bid is in order? > > *From:* Fly Rotary > *Sent:* =E2=80=8ESaturday=E2=80=8E, =E2=80=8EJuly=E2=80=8E =E2=80=8E25=E2= =80=8E, =E2=80=8E2015 =E2=80=8E2=E2=80=8E:=E2=80=8E38=E2=80=8E =E2=80=8EPM > *To:* Fly Rotary > > Absent a viable PSRU solution, there probably is no, =E2=80=9Crotary eng= ine > option=E2=80=9D=E2=80=A6 :>( > > > > B2 > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] > *Sent:* Saturday, July 25, 2015 2:01 PM > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: Anyone or everyone in Oshkosh? > > > > =E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6 no sign of rotaries. > > _________________________________________________________________________= __ > > > > What I have found is that if you want there to be a Rotary Engine forum, > you have to do it yourself. > > If I had a flying Rotary, I would be willing to do this but as I do not, > it would not be appropriate. > > > > We should make an effort to have a =E2=80=9CFly Rotary=E2=80=9D forum and= present our case > for the Rotary Engine as a viable alternative to the piston solution. > > I would propose that this comes from our group rather than as a piggy-bac= k > on to any of the other alternative engine groups. > > I would not want for our engine solution to be sandwich between the > Corvair, Subaru and Volkswagen groups. > > > > If you want to see it there, you have to make it happen. > > > > T Mann > --047d7bfd055055f4c9051bbfc0bb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

There are alternatives.

Bill Jepson

On Jul 25, 2015 8:35 PM, "Thomas Mann"= <flyrotary@lancaironline= .net> wrote:
Well, barring the passage of the=C2=A0=E2=80=9CAffordab= le Airplane Act=E2=80=9D perhaps we should start trying to solve our own pr= oblems.
I don=E2=80=99t know what the t= ransaction was regarding production of Tracy=E2=80=99s design but if it=E2= =80=99s based off of royalties for every unit sold, I would say that it=E2= =80=99s not benefiting anyone.

Perhaps a competitive bid is in order?
<= /div>

From:<= /b>=C2=A0F= ly Rotary
Sent:=C2=A0=E2=80=8ESaturday=E2=80=8E, =E2=80=8EJul= y=E2=80=8E =E2=80=8E25=E2=80=8E, =E2=80=8E2015 =E2=80=8E2=E2=80=8E:=E2=80= =8E38=E2=80=8E =E2=80=8EPM
To:=C2=A0Fly Rotary
<= br>

Absent a viable PSRU= solution, there probably is no, =E2=80=9Crotary engine option=E2=80=9D=E2=80=A6=C2=A0 :>= (

=C2=A0=

B2

=C2=A0=

From:<= font face=3D"Tahoma" size=3D"2"> Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:fl= yrotary@lancaironline.net]
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 201= 5 2:01 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Any= one or everyone in Oshkosh?

=C2=A0

=E2=80=A6=E2=80=A6=C2=A0no sign of rotaries.

______________________________________________________________= _____________

=C2=A0

What I have found is that if you want there to be a Rotary Engine forum, you hav= e to do it yourself.

If I had a flying Rotary, I would be willing to do this but as I do not, it wo= uld not be appropriate.

=C2=A0

We should make an effort to have a=C2=A0=E2=80=9CFly Rotary=E2=80=9D forum and= present our case for the Rotary Engine as a viable alternative to the piston solution.

I would propose that this comes from our group rather than as a piggy-back on= to any of the other alternative engine groups.

I would not want for our engine solution to be sandwich between the Corvair, Subaru and Volkswagen groups.

=C2=A0

If you want to see it there, you have to make it happen.

=C2=A0

T Mann

--047d7bfd055055f4c9051bbfc0bb--