X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "William Schertz" Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.10) with ESMTPS id 7276852 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:31:10 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.223.174; envelope-from=wschertz343@gmail.com Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id rl12so1715572iec.19 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:30:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:importance; bh=LRk+RmK4lZthPHFrvqYLLNVyt/9l5kcI4owNO5kQu4I=; b=Xo1mujVNF0vMny5xLZ0Ts4C1hkn0khEcVyCuM0QqKiUjk3sXoopG4bgolQGWpTE6cC GTvMn/gS6WHlmK4R9JjJlk/kYqVy+aVKitF6OOQux6qYsl3Rspn3MI9axTg7uJMv8vOV gATse0VSlLHEe6m+6vbQOZVuPee5x6sE+DwK2QX6DPEVH/23Zcybb9zPOIGMqtvw4Ovh ghH6/Ljkj7+towDeSMuSB5gQlOmpy6+ZqK3duGqljRJSUE9pvL4a1yCfhfEObZ2Iox1q bZ5z0nSVdU88X49vo3NW2e/zfnczJ58JXRPWemd60eA57pRe7/KKF1F3TskPhBw8LJOI xN2w== X-Received: by 10.43.172.6 with SMTP id nw6mr2567878icc.89.1416241837045; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:30:37 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from OwnerPC (host-184-166-77-245.msl-mt.client.bresnan.net. [184.166.77.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm6163784igp.15.2014.11.17.08.30.35 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:30:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: the List Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:30:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513 Too bad, Matt's list works well. For the first 10 years I ran a simple "majordomo" list for the KIS list, then had it transferred to Matt. He organized all the archives and made them searchable. Bill -----Original Message----- From: Charlie England Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 9:34 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: the List Absolutely not! I wish that the RV-list was still the go-to place for RV guys, but it's not. Seems like RVers only go to Matt's lists for aeroelectric info. Unfortunately, most RVers have abandoned Matt for one of the forum-only setups, and it really is covered with ads. Charlie On 11/16/2014 3:40 PM, William Schertz wrote: > Charlie, > Were you making reference to the RV list on Matronix? Where the > Aeroelectric list is maintained? I haven't noticed advertising or > censoring on Aeroelectric, but he does solicit $ once a year. > Bill > > -----Original Message----- From: Charlie England > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 11:01 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: the List > > On 11/15/2014 9:47 AM, Mark McClure wrote: >> In the past I have not kept the flyrotary emails. I read and delete >> because they are available on the archives. >> >> Today while trying to search or just go the second page I got nowhere. >> >> I know that the list hasn’t gotten much use lately - hopefully because >> everyone has flying projects and they are out flying and not because of >> loss of interest. >> >> If I remember right the original owner of the list has moved on from >> Rotaries but keeps it going as a service. >> Is there any interest in trying to take the list to a more modern setup? >> Hopefully with the ability to take the archive with it. >> >> Mark McClure > > I've given this a bit of thought, too, but wasn't sure how to approach > it. I'm very grateful to have this list, and would hate to see it > migrate to a place like Yahoo groups. I'm a member of numerous groups on > Yahoo, and the interface is about as bad as I can imagine. > > I would, however, like to see a more user-friendly search engine for the > archives. (Or maybe I just need a tutorial for dummies...) It would also > be nice to have a slightly bigger size limit for attachments; often the > small size limits usability of the images. > > But I know that stuff like that can be expensive, therefore: > > One thing I would strongly support would be some kind of fund raiser to > fund the maintenance of this list. Neither computer hardware nor > internet bandwidth is free, and Marv has shouldered the burden for what > has to be close to two decades and never asked one dime of us. In > contrast, the most heavily used forum for RV-x builder/fliers is > littered with advertising (list owner actually makes his living from > it), it's heavily censored, and his minions attempt to shame > participants into donating cash every year. If Marv will accept > financial support, I'll be the 1st to write a check, regardless of > whether the archives get 'upgraded'. > > How about it; should we start a support fund? > > Charlie > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html