Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #6064
From: Bob Darrah <RDarrah@austin.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: [VAF Mailing List] Engine Choice
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:57:24 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Jim Sower wrote:

<... A wind milling prop DOES have hugh drag compared to a
stopped one ...>
I know a wind milling prop (prop turning engine) has more drag
than a stopped prop (frozen engine or not enough airspeed to
overcome engine compression).  This guy specified a freewheeling
prop (sprag clutch that is in the overrunning mode).  There is
no resistance at all to the prop and the only "work" the
slipstream has to do is overcome the negligible sprag clutch
free wheeling friction
Snip

It depends:  a free-wheeling prop in flat (high rpm) has considerable drag.
Add some pitch, and the drag goes down rapidly.  As an example, take a
helicopter in autorotation or a auto-gyro.  the prop (rotor) is in flat
pitch and is freewheeling.

I can't argue with your experience, but I had always understood
that a frozen prop had less drag than a prop wind milling the
engine, but that the difference was not significant.

My understanding is that the difference is very significant.

A> freewheeling prop is waaaay different from a wind milling prop.
Like if you have a sprag clutch and turn up the engine to high
rpm and then shut it down, the engine stops immediately but the
prop will keep spinning for a couple of minutes.

Or as long as the wind turns it.

<... When you think wind milling drag ... think prop circle
area, not just the blades cross section themselves. Square yards
of drag, not square ft ...>
I don't think that's exactly the way it works quantitatively.
Maybe Marc can help.  Oooops!  Marc is not on this list.

Maybe not exactly, but darn close.

As I read it .... Jim S.


And as I read it....Bob Darrah


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster