X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from zixvpm1.fdic.gov ([167.176.6.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6506800 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:42:14 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=167.176.6.41; envelope-from=brogers@fdic.gov Received: from 127.0.0.1 (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) by Outbound.fdic.gov (Proprietary) with SMTP id 394EC940484 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:41:39 -0400 (EDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ZIXVPM_13c2a3898e7; d=FDIC.gov; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=UyLNzuUxh/+ypiAOVgRp7D7r4wYgLPJ0CTm0eB4GoNUmR2vmGtEytwXzzaLr3pt3 GjO2O31xras1ILSbTKQetYMCZaeQFZRQ421RwXmyobYargOmHlpurd9J92tfXU vODlb4idddu6HHcrKAGXQhHObwie8c5DVSWaJfcc9in6Y=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=FDIC.gov; s=ZIXVPM_13c2a3898e7; t=1381246899; bh=OXQAqsP8GsVXIy5GJHHEy0RyUznTWkCtXqfj4USPRoU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=fDgWyWNStbWzcvTJH7utybyScFutlXWgVqdLTS2okxmI46hddn5wwRIq5rg764FKP a8kwYkjKxvezvLvFd9CUS7aQt3fGxFXZCTGIHUeImlK2ga4XxW5WTS3QeVmYjQ3scf /n4krSUrC5r3hyVBusepge6OvFVfxuD26NWEggcQ= Received: from mail3.fdic.gov (unknown [10.30.1.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zixvpm1.fdic.gov (Proprietary) with ESMTPS id 140CD940476 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:41:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail3.fdic.gov (vasdlp [10.30.1.14]) by mail3.fdic.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r98Ffcus017242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:41:38 -0400 From: "Rogers, Bob J." To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Multiple coolant pressure Caps Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Multiple coolant pressure Caps Thread-Index: Ac7EPTEwVxICKNUyQBWCdMIkAXBisg== Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:41:36 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.25.246.150] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A8231A582CEF934C91A71AE4C6BD94A223296AC2RCHWEXC002CPPRO_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-VPM-MSG-ID: 2785e186-d05e-42d5-bc5e-587d56b279f9 X-VPM-HOST: zixvpm1.fdic.gov X-VPM-ENC-REGIME: Plaintext X-VPM-CERT-FLAG: 0 X-VPM-IS-HYBRID: 0 --_000_A8231A582CEF934C91A71AE4C6BD94A223296AC2RCHWEXC002CPPRO_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeff, I have a similar setup with my radiator. I put a high pressure cap on the = radiator and a lower pressure cap on the expansion tank. It works great. = No fluid has ever escaped from the high pressure cap on the radiator. Bob J. Rogers Mazda 13B Turbo Mustang II From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beh= alf Of Jeff Whaley Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 8:35 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Multiple coollant pressure Caps My original radiator was custom-built and had no filler neck. I bought a n= ew stock radiator that comes with a filler neck and pressure cap. I alread= y have an expansion tank high on the firewall with a filler neck and pressu= re cap. The radiator will be mounted under the engine. In this scenario i= s it acceptable to have 2 pressure caps? I don't really want the second ca= p and am considering getting it welded shut - but do I have to? If the low= er-mounted pressure cap has the highest pressure rating I'm thinking it sho= uld be okay. Has anyone tried this? Jeff This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended only for the a= ddressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. Any unauth= orized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message= in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct our internal= records. Please then delete the original message. Thank you. --_000_A8231A582CEF934C91A71AE4C6BD94A223296AC2RCHWEXC002CPPRO_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jeff,

I have a similar setup with= my radiator.  I put a high pressure cap on the radiator and a lower p= ressure cap on the expansion tank.  It works great.  No fluid has ever escaped from the high pressure cap on the radiator.

Bob J. Rogers

Mazda 13B Turbo

Mustang II

 

From: Rotary m= otors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Whaley
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 8:35 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Multiple coollant pressure Caps

 

My original radiator was custom-built and had no fil= ler neck.  I bought a new stock radiator that comes with a filler neck= and pressure cap.  I already have an expansion tank high on the firew= all with a filler neck and pressure cap.  The radiator will be mounted under the engine.  In this scenario is it ac= ceptable to have 2 pressure caps?  I don’t really want the secon= d cap and am considering getting it welded shut - but do I have to?  I= f the lower-mounted pressure cap has the highest pressure rating I’m thinking it should be okay.  Has anyone tried this?<= o:p>

Jeff

This message, and the documents atta= ched hereto, is intended only for the addressee and may contain privileged = or confidential information. Any unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please= notify us immediately so that we may correct our internal records. Please = then delete the original message. Thank you.

--_000_A8231A582CEF934C91A71AE4C6BD94A223296AC2RCHWEXC002CPPRO_--