X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from pacmmta53.windstream.net ([162.39.147.112] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5066510 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:47:42 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=162.39.147.112; envelope-from=montyr2157@windstream.net Return-Path: X-WS-COS: WSOB804 X-Cloudmark-Category: Undefined:Undefined X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=n/Nva8et/6IqMv5SHDD1XrQmz4ukiSvK7Vw2zWm0Wss= c=1 sm=0 a=xIL87xIwQJsA:10 a=UT_QgiwtmQIA:10 a=IpslU4ztAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=22YbiGlPoFMBpy_RbQ0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=cr0eg9oN50EA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=Zk3OmFfbAAAA:8 a=UiRHQJye7AwIyjKRsDcA:9 a=7072m2sIVmUnCwFOF8MA:7 a=nzOgunfUX_UA:10 a=x46t9oslO7cA:10 a=nHmRiZsTQzTYs/aOX1aQdw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Authentication-Results: pacmmta53 smtp.user=montyr2157; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [98.20.158.154] ([98.20.158.154:60703] helo=newbox) by pacmmta53 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.45 r()) with ESMTPA id 69/41-11492-A66713E4; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:47:06 -0400 Message-ID: <3DE8A39A5A8948ADB844445040E879B6@newbox> From: "MONTY ROBERTS" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Kitplanes Article - Safety is no Accident Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:47:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01CC4D0B.4D91C6C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01CC4D0B.4D91C6C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since I'm involved in the design of a gearbox at present, I just thought = I'd add that this is non-trivial to do properly. The lawyers at the gear = manufacturer have made it impossible to use their design data, unless = you are designing stationary equipment (HEAVY!!). This means testing is = required to get accurate life data for each particular application. The = problem is, to have statistically meaningful data you will have to test = at least 10 articles. This is very expensive. Not something that a guy = in his garage can afford to do properly. If you have statistical design = data...you don't give it out. So....the best bet is to use something the = airboat guys use successfully, or something people are currently flying = successfully.=20 The flexplate failure looks like typical high cycle fatigue. Since these = are used parts, we don't know the part history. It could have been = installed improperly in the car or had a manufacturing defect. The fact = that two people have experienced failures may be a trend, maybe not.=20 1.) Inspect all flex plates very carefully before installation. = Magnaflux/Dye penetrant, etc. 2.) Replace the rubber dampers at annual 3.) Do regular Flexplate inspections. 4.) Use a new flex plate if possible.=20 If people continue to have failures, then it's time for redesign, but I = wouldn't say that just yet. The two failures were relatively high power = installations. Monty ----- Original Message -----=20 From: ben haas=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 9:21 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Kitplanes Article - Safety is no Accident Great article for sure..... =20 The introduction picture is kool too. Ben Haas www.haaspowerair.com =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:27:51 -0500 From: msteitle@gmail.com Subject: [FlyRotary] Kitplanes Article - Safety is no Accident There was an article in the February 2011 issue of Kitplanes titled, = "Safety is no Accident", by Ron Wanttaja. In light of the recent = flexplate failures, I found it interesting that it highlights two areas = where automotive engines tend to fail, the cooling system and the gear = reduction unit. To quote, "Note that auto conversions have a higher = accident rate right where you would expect it--in engine cooling and in = the systems that convert engine power to a slower speed for a propeller = or helicopter rotor." Seems that we've hit on one of the primary = failure modes here. According to Ron's calculations, the accident rate = for auto engine homebuilts was 23% higher than for homebuilts with = traditional engines. The rotary had the fewest total accidents, but the = rotary also has the fewest number of a/c flying. This is a well written = article that should be on everyone's reading list. =20 Note: Mr. Wanttaja is a systems engineer, engaged in satellite = orbit/constellation design and analysis, launch vehicle and onboard = propulsion system trades, and operations concepts for space systems. He = worked on the early design studies for the International Space Station. = Mark=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01CC4D0B.4D91C6C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Since I'm involved in the design of a gearbox at = present,=20 I just thought I'd add that this is non-trivial to do properly. The = lawyers at=20 the gear manufacturer have made it impossible to use their design data, = unless=20 you are designing stationary equipment (HEAVY!!). This means testing is = required=20 to get accurate life data for each particular application. The problem = is, to=20 have statistically meaningful data you will have to test at least 10 = articles.=20 This is very expensive. Not something that a guy in his garage can = afford to do=20 properly. If you have statistical design data...you don't give it out. = So....the=20 best bet is to use something the airboat guys use successfully, or = something=20 people are currently flying successfully.
 
The flexplate failure looks like typical = high cycle=20 fatigue. Since these are used parts, we don't know the=20 part history. It could have been installed improperly in the car or = had a=20 manufacturing defect. The fact that two people have experienced failures = may be=20 a trend, maybe not.
 
1.) Inspect all flex plates very carefully = before=20 installation. Magnaflux/Dye penetrant, etc.
 
2.) Replace the rubber dampers at = annual
 
3.) Do regular Flexplate = inspections.
 
4.) Use a new flex plate if possible. =
 
 
If  people continue to have failures, then = it's time=20 for redesign, but I wouldn't say that just yet. The two failures were = relatively=20 high power installations.
 
Monty
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 ben = haas=20
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 = 9:21=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Kitplanes=20 Article - Safety is no Accident

Great article for sure.....
 
The = introduction picture=20 is kool too.  <GG>

Ben = Haas
www.haaspowerair.com
<= BR> 

To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Date:=20 Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:27:51 -0500
From: msteitle@gmail.com
Subject:=20 [FlyRotary] Kitplanes Article - Safety is no Accident

There was an article in the February 2011 issue of Kitplanes = titled,=20 "Safety is no Accident", by Ron Wanttaja.  In light of the=20 recent flexplate failures, I found it interesting that it = highlights=20 two areas where automotive engines tend to fail, the cooling = system and=20 the gear reduction unit.  To quote, "Note that auto = conversions have=20 a higher accident rate right where you would expect it--in engine = cooling and=20 in the systems that convert engine power to a slower speed for a = propeller or=20 helicopter rotor."  Seems that we've hit on one of = the=20 primary failure modes here.  According to Ron's = calculations, the=20 accident rate for auto engine homebuilts was 23% higher = than=20 for homebuilts with traditional engines.  The rotary had the = fewest total=20 accidents, but the rotary also has the fewest number of a/c = flying.  This=20 is a well written article that should be on everyone's reading=20 list. 
 
Note:  Mr. Wanttaja is a systems engineer, engaged in = satellite=20 orbit/constellation design and analysis, launch vehicle and onboard = propulsion=20 system trades, and operations concepts for space systems.  He = worked on=20 the early design studies for the International Space Station.  =
 
Mark
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0026_01CC4D0B.4D91C6C0--