X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5063909 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:41:49 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.207.164; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.204]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p6QFf9fx008550 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:41:09 -0400 Received: from core-mod004c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mod004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.196.13]) by mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id DB757E000089 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:41:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: <65afb.1effc654.3b603a14@aol.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:41:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Injector mounting in top of block? To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_65afb.1effc654.3b603a14_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 5004 X-AOL-IP: 173.88.24.45 X-Originating-IP: [173.88.24.45] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:384096000:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33cc4e2ee01411e4 --part1_65afb.1effc654.3b603a14_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It seems to me to be the next step in evolution. But it may be that it is for economy rather than power, and not worth it for aircraft but required for a car engine. Lynn E. Hanover In a message dated 7/26/2011 7:59:36 A.M. Paraguay Standard Time, shipchief@aol.com writes: I was wondering if anyone had given a thought to mounting a fuel injector in the top of the rotor housing like the 16b concept engine? They may never get around to selling the 16b to the public, but we could mod a 13b? It can't be any tougher than a P Port job? Anyway, it would get the fuel system a little farther from the exhaust heat, and could run better too? _http://gallery.eaa326.org/v/members/semery/_ (http://gallery.eaa326.org/v/members/semery/) Scott --part1_65afb.1effc654.3b603a14_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It seems to me to be the next step in evolution. But it may be that it= is=20 for economy rather than power, and not worth it for aircraft but required f= or a=20 car engine.
 
Lynn E. Hanover
 
In a message dated 7/26/2011 7:59:36 A.M. Paraguay Standard Time,=20 shipchief@aol.com writes:
=
I was wondering if anyone had given a thought = to=20 mounting a fuel injector in the top of the rotor housing like the 16b con= cept=20 engine?
They may never get around to selling the= =20 16b to the public, but we could mod a 13b?
It can't be any tougher than a P Port job? Any= way, it=20 would get the fuel system a little farther from the exhaust heat, and cou= ld=20 run better too?
Scott
 --part1_65afb.1effc654.3b603a14_boundary--