X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <echristley@att.net>
Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2)
  with ESMTPS id 4902091 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:37:29 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.240.18.37; envelope-from=echristley@att.net
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,296,1297065600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="528675900"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124])
  by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2011 08:36:33 -0800
Received: from [10.62.16.200] (ernestc-laptop.hq.netapp.com [10.62.16.200])
	by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id p2AGaWDr007606
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D78FE05.1070408@att.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:36:21 -0500
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@att.net>
Reply-To: echristley@att.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100623)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Crankcase ventilation
References: <list-4902040@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4902040@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've not provided for clean way to vent the crankcase, yet.  And I'm also not going to use the oil injection ports.  As 
I understand it, the injection ports should always be at a negative pressure.  Would it be a crazy idea to have the 
ports pull the dirty air out of the crankcase and not spread it across my airplane's belly?