X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.234] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2o) with SMTP id 4892898 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:40:07 -0500 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.234; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from [98.139.91.68] by nm28.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2011 22:39:30 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.46] by tm8.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2011 22:39:30 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1046.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2011 22:39:30 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 123586.75554.bm@omp1046.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 42863 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2011 22:39:29 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.25] (echristley@74.242.202.241 with plain) by smtp104.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Mar 2011 14:39:28 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: 40RP3pGswBDvPav1a.I8eMv.KS8bdgWBnCloVoKaow-- X-YMail-OSG: TKEyE7sVM1nWEcsY8EXXrRdYvXuUiJWdPEr54ej38J2JrsC OJirbyQDjTvbohlWN9Uj0FIYFoJlaghOxz7dszezxdnQ1Y854_XMjQgg2KB6 qafPMXdoOc3J5VZUKPHYUlFVOVl3LD7_JuQl8.c1GYf_uh4C6J3tAU6Q1Yrb 0g.Z242gSThNbtcw5kIkPq5K2MmG_Gkib3jaH7cRfoCm_q.ytbETdxljc00W p_Exx87sDV2NE1YWycrTtXZaGiz9teZ70KgjU0bGewaQj_MuRCpn_g0wUxBC BU44Iz_UJw615damyqu_ig6U.raT0f5By7Z9uUlw- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4D740CAE.7040806@nc.rr.com> Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:37:34 -0500 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@att.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: For Sale References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030603090500030309050500" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030603090500030309050500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/06/2011 11:24 AM, Bill Bradburry wrote: > > I have one for the Renesis... > > > Well, maybe not. I just checked and it is bent on the bottom. It > does have the oil level sensor in it tho... > > Bill B > > http://www.rotaryengineillustrated.com/evolution-of-the-parts/evolution-oil-pan.html What I have began life as an FC pan. I cut off the flange, and layed up a fiberglass sump. It has a slow leak at the rear, right where the glass meets the flange. You know, where it was difficult to test. If I could fit the Renesis pan, I think I would. Except for the bolt pattern, I think it would slide right in with out requiring in further modifications. Kelly, do you have any FC pans? --------------030603090500030309050500 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/06/2011 11:24 AM, Bill Bradburry wrote:

I have one for the Renesis…

Well, maybe not. I just checked and it is bent on the bottom. It does have the oil level sensor in it tho…

Bill B

http://www.rotaryengineillustrated.com/evolution-of-the-parts/evolution-oil-pan.html

What I have began life as an FC pan. I cut off the flange, and layed up a fiberglass sump. It has a slow leak at the rear, right where the glass meets the flange. You know, where it was difficult to test. If I could fit the Renesis pan, I think I would. Except for the bolt pattern, I think it would slide right in with out requiring in further modifications.

Kelly, do you have any FC pans?
--------------030603090500030309050500--