X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with SMTP id 4571598 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:11:46 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.198.104; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: (qmail 54417 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 00:11:10 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1289261469; bh=fz4FQxMh5MVy5FzZOU7AqJzD3v319AzHahEhIJdLT5c=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cR5xuiSwNO28zKAWy59mAAJHeWrJKeOeQrmB6q5SrI24WgrAvnq3QRa1ceif5izGTX/PcDRfDfPWncTapOjavJzoftY1NG8ZWiCGIXdGd9l18mH7BkZlkGWZ9Va+m6oNZj/w3/+AY8judHKH12PB/aR3xvbmqutstYOA4oa1M78= Received: from [192.168.10.5] (ceengland@98.95.178.148 with plain) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 08 Nov 2010 16:11:09 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: uXJ_6LOswBCr8InijhYErvjWlJuRkoKPGNeiuu7PA.5wcGoy X-YMail-OSG: VQCTsxEVM1lHJJ35ImR_FUn6819YdWK6v3zejtpLsYS5Jaw Vd6fGriELyAtHm0aE7nfirxTnBhrHE2ZvtqUa3h.8UD3nNyhh.6TxjV9yfeU YNTXTomzeDjsrFNo1CpPEavXbUfoNEVyok91IE2EZAyhVq2ItSKEVcjiPxYE y8oi675hq0YdtykMeN7EG67MIqctFs0V5aj1JM58DpxQw_73Pk0hXc.YTqQc vQg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4CD89216.50902@bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:13:10 -0600 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Bear hawk dream airplane References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/8/2010 3:08 PM, Don Walker wrote: > On 11/8/2010 10:43 AM, Don Walker wrote: >> Dustin, >> My hanger landlord, a 20,000 hour ATP finished building a Bearhawk >> with an 0-540 in it. He's a serial builder and it's a 10.5 out of >> 10. According to him, the design has several serious flaws. He put >> it on it's back in a moderate crosswind. Cost him 30 grand. After >> checking out the problem he found: The landing gear from the factory >> are not straight. He modified and straightened them. It needs Much >> more engine offset. The tail is much too small. Factory support >> leaves much to be desired and design deficiency problems are left to >> be worked out by the builders. The company may be in financial >> trouble. I have flown it in once with him since all the rework. >> Nice solid airplane and not as heavy on the controls as many. I >> watched his landing on a no wind day and he worked very hard with a >> lot of fast stick and rudder work. He still won't fly it with >> moderate cross winds. There is a Bearhawk builders group on Yahoo. >> Suggest you spend a lot of time reading over the postings. Just a >> heads up. >> >> Don Walker >> RV-8 Renesis >> Flying and modifying > Charles England > F-4, MD-80, Built 2 RV-8s too! I'm always happy to stir things up. > Flame on! > Don Walker The F-4 & MD-80 time doesn't mean diddly when you start flying a tailwheel a/c (which is what I was talking about in my 1st post). I've never had the chance to fly a Bearhawk but I have had fighter pilots try to fly my -4. The ones that know how to use their feet didn't learn it in the military or at the airlines. No flaming intended; I just want to know a critic's credentials. :-) Charlie