Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.53.202; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net
Message-ID: <4CD85FF2.8010709@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:39:14 -0600
From: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Bear hawk dream airplane
References: <list-4571156@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4571156@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/8/2010 12:43 PM, Don Walker wrote:
> Dustin,
> My hanger landlord, a 20,000 hour ATP finished building a Bearhawk 
> with an 0-540 in it.  He's a serial builder and it's a 10.5 out of 
> 10.  According to him, the design has several serious flaws.  He put 
> it on it's back in a moderate crosswind.  Cost him 30 grand.  After 
> checking out the problem he found:  The landing gear from the factory 
> are not straight.  He modified and straightened them.  It needs Much 
> more engine offset.  The tail is much too small.  Factory support 
> leaves much to be desired and design deficiency problems are left to 
> be worked out by the builders.  The company may be in financial 
> trouble.  I have flown it in once with him since all the rework.  Nice 
> solid airplane and not as heavy on the controls as many.  I watched 
> his landing on a no wind day and he worked very hard with a lot of 
> fast stick and rudder work.  He still won't fly it with moderate cross 
> winds.  There is a Bearhawk builders group on Yahoo.  Suggest you 
> spend a lot of time reading over the postings.  Just a heads up.
>
> Don Walker
> RV-8 Renesis
> Flying and modifying
There are high time US military fighter pilots that I wouldn't let 
anywhere near the controls of my RV if we are near the ground. 20000hr 
ATP flying what a/c?

Charlie