X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.17] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4551269 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:42:13 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.30.17; envelope-from=hoursaway1@comcast.net Received: from omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11]) by qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id RxzL1f00A0EPchoAAzhdlo; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:41:37 +0000 Received: from sz0081.ev.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.26.137]) by omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Rzhd1f0082xV6SL8MzhdRE; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:41:37 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:41:37 +0000 (UTC) From: hoursaway1@comcast.net To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: <1598328599.521753.1288654897100.JavaMail.root@sz0081a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] How fast is it safe to turn a Prop. Opinion Poll MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_521752_607400970.1288654897099" X-Originating-IP: [68.61.190.35] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.5_GA_2431.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.5_GA_2427.RHEL4) ------=_Part_521752_607400970.1288654897099 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Airframe control flutter, carefull Dave,=C2=A0we other "Rotary folks" love = ya.=C2=A0=C2=A0 David R. Cook RV6A Rotary=C2=A0 (45 on ASI down the runway,= feeling good. Temps good, tied to truck full cowl, full throttle, 5975=C2= =A0 29.5 MAP 10 min. ).=C2=A0=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "David Leonard" =20 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" =20 Sent: Monday, November 1, 2010 2:49:04 PM=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] How fast is it safe to turn a Prop. Opinion Poll=20 So I am getting a little more bold with my new=C2=A0turbo.=C2=A0 On the way= home today I decided to open it up a little bit.=C2=A0 At 8500' and MAP ar= ound 34", I was at 6700 RPM and 201 KTAS (about 3060 RPM at the prop with t= he tips doing 860fps).=C2=A0 Temps still less than 160, plenty of throttle = left.=C2=A0 I just couldn't accept turning the prop any faster, not knowing= what the limit really is.=20 My prop is a 64" diameter (pretty short) Catto (wood/composite) with a numb= er of nicks in the leading edge and has not been dynamical balanced to date= .=20 I talked to Craig Catto about the issue and=C2=A0what he told me completely= makes sense, but is utterly unhelpful in setting my racing redline.=C2=A0 = He said that I could turn it as fast as I want, but the risk of separating = the prop. increases as I go faster.=C2=A0 I just depends on too many factor= s.=20 I realize the the final number is going to depend on my risk tolerance and = how much I really want to post some big numbers in a race.=C2=A0 But it is = hard for me to balance that without better understand or the factors on the= prop, hence, the opinion poll, on various factors..=20 I have heard that it is important to keep the prop tips under 900 fps, whil= e others say it is not a factor.=C2=A0 Is there some important number for t= he max tip speed?=C2=A0 Is it a safety issue or an efficiency issue?=20 Most of my nicks in the paint and composite layer are in the outer 1/3 of t= he prop.=C2=A0 Are these a big deal for safety?=C2=A0 Efficiency?=20 If I were to run the engine at 7000 RPM that would give me 3225 at the prop= , tips doing 900 FPS an an aircraft speed of around 209 kts (240mph).=C2=A0= This seems pretty reasonable to me as an upper limit, but it is scary a li= ttle.=20 But what about 8000RPM at the engine (if I have the power to get there)?=C2= =A0 With a cleaned up and balanced prop, that would be almost 3700 RPM at t= he prop, tips doing 1020fps, aircraft going=C2=A0something less than 240kts= =C2=A0(275 mph).=C2=A0 Stupid though? Or give it a try and see how close to= those numbers I can get?=20 Any issues with the gear-box going that fast, other factors I am not consid= ering?=20 Anyway, it feels really cool to have broken 200kts in level flight.=20 --=20 David Leonard=20 Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY=20 http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net=20 http://RotaryRoster.net=20 ------=_Part_521752_607400970.1288654897099 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Airframe control flutter, carefull Dave, we other "Rotary folks" love ya.   David R. Cook RV6A Rotary  (45 on ASI down the runway, feeling good. Temps good, tied to truck full cowl, full throttle, 5975  29.5 MAP 10 min. ). 
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Leonard" <wdleonard@gmail.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2010 2:49:04 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] How fast is it safe to turn a Prop. Opinion Poll

So I am getting a little more bold with my new turbo.  On the way home today I decided to open it up a little bit.  At 8500' and MAP around 34", I was at 6700 RPM and 201 KTAS (about 3060 RPM at the prop with the tips doing 860fps).  Temps still less than 160, plenty of throttle left.  I just couldn't accept turning the prop any faster, not knowing what the limit really is.

My prop is a 64" diameter (pretty short) Catto (wood/composite) with a number of nicks in the leading edge and has not been dynamical balanced to date.
 
I talked to Craig Catto about the issue and what he told me completely makes sense, but is utterly unhelpful in setting my racing redline.  He said that I could turn it as fast as I want, but the risk of separating the prop. increases as I go faster.  I just depends on too many factors.
 
I realize the the final number is going to depend on my risk tolerance and how much I really want to post some big numbers in a race.  But it is hard for me to balance that without better understand or the factors on the prop, hence, the opinion poll, on various factors..
 
I have heard that it is important to keep the prop tips under 900 fps, while others say it is not a factor.  Is there some important number for the max tip speed?  Is it a safety issue or an efficiency issue?
 
Most of my nicks in the paint and composite layer are in the outer 1/3 of the prop.  Are these a big deal for safety?  Efficiency?
 
If I were to run the engine at 7000 RPM that would give me 3225 at the prop, tips doing 900 FPS an an aircraft speed of around 209 kts (240mph).  This seems pretty reasonable to me as an upper limit, but it is scary a little.
 
But what about 8000RPM at the engine (if I have the power to get there)?  With a cleaned up and balanced prop, that would be almost 3700 RPM at the prop, tips doing 1020fps, aircraft going something less than 240kts (275 mph).  Stupid though? Or give it a try and see how close to those numbers I can get?
 
Any issues with the gear-box going that fast, other factors I am not considering?
 
Anyway, it feels really cool to have broken 200kts in level flight.

--
David Leonard

Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY
http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net
http://RotaryRoster.net
------=_Part_521752_607400970.1288654897099--