X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-da06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.169.203] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.6) with ESMTP id 4248760 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 May 2010 12:33:01 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.169.203; envelope-from=Bktrub@aol.com Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-da06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o45GWLqe007438 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 12:32:21 -0400 Received: from Bktrub@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.d34.6dd040a4 (43846) for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 12:32:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from magic-m22.mail.aol.com (magic-m22.mail.aol.com [172.20.22.195]) by cia-dc04.mx.aol.com (v128.3) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC043-ab464be19d911b6; Wed, 05 May 2010 12:32:17 -0400 From: Bktrub@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 12:32:04 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel filters To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_b602.78e175ed.3912f784_boundary" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5377 X-AOL-ORIG-IP: 71.112.30.207 X-AOL-IP: 172.20.22.195 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Bktrub@aol.com --part1_b602.78e175ed.3912f784_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit After the fuel pumps. I have two fuel pumps, and I figure that they are less susceptible to clogging than the injectors. Why? Does this raise any flags? Brian Trubee --part1_b602.78e175ed.3912f784_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
After the fuel pumps. I have two fuel pumps, and I figure that they= are=20 less susceptible to clogging than the injectors. Why? Does this raise any= =20 flags?
 
Brian Trubee
--part1_b602.78e175ed.3912f784_boundary--