X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.6) with ESMTP id 4244175 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 01 May 2010 18:19:29 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (mail.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.34]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C422173876 for ; Sun, 2 May 2010 06:18:52 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CDB1BEC002 for ; Sun, 2 May 2010 06:18:52 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ejector cooling Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 08:18:52 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100501-0, 05/01/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Joe, 9" Dia seems big, be careful as to not create a +ve pressure in the cowl, I would isolate the Rads from the cowl area with appropriate ducting. Please keep us informed on how it works out for you. George (down under) > Hi, > > I have built my engine installation around an exhaust augmenter. It is > 24" > long and started it's live as a 9"dia stove pipe. It runs the length of > the > cowl and discharges aways from the prop ( pusher) I will route the > headers > forward then up near where the old oil injector pump used to be. I plan > to > us a Spin tech muffler and route that into the augmenter. The augmenter > is > built into the cowl and is removable. Air comes in a F16 5' long scoop > and > flows through the rad and oil cooler and dumps into the cowling. The only > way out is the augmenter tube. I may have to build a plenum that directs > the air behind the rad and oil cooler directly into the augmenter. This > arangement causes the alternator and water pump to be mounted on the left > side of the motor and down almost on top of the radiator. Radiator is > lying flat below and forward of the motor. The intake and injection stuff > fills up the right side of the cowl and wing root area. I really envy the > RV side by side and Cozy MkIV guys, they have lots of room . > > > Joe Berki > Limo EZ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Bradburry" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:49 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ejector cooling > > >> Marc, >> Could you get some drawings and put them on the list? I think a lot of >> folks would like to see how it would look and might try it. >> >> Bill B >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On >> Behalf Of Marc de Piolenc >> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:24 AM >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Ejector cooling >> >> Mike Wills wrote the quoted passages: >> >> "1) It adds measurable weight." >> >> Compared with what? What if a small addition of weight solves your >> cooling problems and reduces cooling drag. Would you refuse to do it? >> >> "2) It adds complexity." >> >> How complex can a device with no moving parts be? >> >> "3) It adds noise (that alone in hindsight makes me glad I didn't do it >> - god knows I don't need more noise)." >> >> No. Mixer-ejectors are used for noise REDUCTION. Successfully. >> >> "4) And finally, not a single person I spoke with noticed a measurable >> improvement in either cooling performance or drag reduction after adding >> an augmentor, or noticed a measurable reduction after eliminating the >> augmentor." >> >> You seem to have consulted a very select group. In volume 2 of >> Alternative Engines, page 139 et seq, Charles Airesman Jr. documents his >> experiments with a very primitive ejector that generated 6 inches of >> water pressure drop under shop runup conditions. That equates to a >> considerable shaft power savings, more reliable ground cooling and a big >> step forward. And this was Airesman's first attempt. >> >> There are other success stories if you choose to seek them out. >> >> Best regards, >> Marc de Piolenc >> >> Those seem like good enough reasons to pass on an augmentor unless you >> are one of those guys that just has to prove it to yourself. >> >> Mike Wills >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: >> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >