Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2911994 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 07:53:34 -0500 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id hBVCrRHH013509 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 07:53:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000d01c3cf9c$63895be0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel rail plumbing (for RV-8) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 07:48:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Kevin, Rigid tubes can be certainly be used, however, as I am certain you know, you do need to ensure that they are approriately supported and braced. Vibration has been know to fatique such lines if they are not of the proper material, installed and supported appropriately. Copper lines for example are notorious for becoming work hardened and brittle through vibration. You clearly recognize the possibility of fatique by your use of the stainless steel braided line between your firewall components and your engine. I personally use only stainless steel braided lines for everything as that essentially elminates the possiblity of failure due to vibration and fatique. The down side is more weight and costs than the solid lines. my $0.02 worth Ed Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "kevin lane" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 11:48 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel rail plumbing (for RV-8) > with two rigidly mounted connections, the fuel rails and the regulator, why > not use a rigid line which must be cheaper? on my Lycoming I have a braided > lines between the firewall and the engine (fuel supply and oil > cooler-firewall mounted) and rigid lines everywhere else, fuel pump to carb > too, simply because I didn't know to do it any differently. it has 1000+ > hrs on it. (I'm not questioning your choice, just wanting to learn why) > Kevin Lane Portland, OR > e-mail-> n3773@comcast.net > web-> http://home.comcast.net/~n3773 > (browse w/ internet explorer) > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marvin Kaye" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:05 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel rail plumbing (for RV-8) > > > > > > > I guess I'll have a braided line from the firewall to the first > > rail, > > with the pump behind the firewall somewhere, and another braided line for > > the return. somewhere I need to insert a fuel pressure regulator, since I > > sawed off the one I had thinking it was something else (duh). will it > need > > to be in the engine compartment? < < < > > > > > > > > The fuel pressure regulator on the Eagle is located at the far end of the > > rails. Fuel comes out of the firewall through a single -6 hose and tees > to > > the rails... at the other end of the rails there are another pair of -6 > lines > > that hook up to each side of the regulator (photo attached). The -4 > return > > line comes out of the bottom of the regulator and goes back to the > selected > > tank through the (fairly expensive) fuel selector valve. > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html