Message

Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:07:24 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from cardinal.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.121.226] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2780432 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:12:34 -0500 Received: from user-2injqvh.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.121.235.241] helo=Carol) by cardinal.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ARBGM-0001Ge-00 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 06:12:27 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <011301c3b8de$417f5420$0000a398@Carol> From: "sqpilot@earthlink" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: More wacky water pump plans X-Original-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:12:00 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0110_01C3B8AB.F6000260" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0110_01C3B8AB.F6000260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Russell Duffy=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:04 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: More wacky water pump plans Brilliant Rusty - except that if you loose the belts you wont have = much juice left for the EWP.=20 The life expectancy (engine and pilot) is far longer without an = alternator, than without water flow :-)=20 Seriously, I think the advantage of the EWP might be removal of the = mechanical pump load and weight. If I were going with EWP I'd get two = and loose the mechanical pump. Go with a standard rad - it'll save you = about the cost of the second EWP, plus less load on the belts to keep = you're alternator running.=20 I already have two EWP's, and running both, with no mechanical pump is = still an option. Unfortunately, packaging is still an issue. = Remember, skinny metal, not fat plastic :-)=20 Rusty (I hope I get the chance to critique your work ) Hi, Rusty....regarding the skinny metal, I assume you are referring to = the EWP. Do you have the Meziere pumps? It does sound logical to go = with the two EWP's and dump the mechanical pump. Save weight , have = redundancy, and not rob precious horsepower from the engine. Just a = thought from someone who hasn't done it yet, so consider the source. I = do like the adapter plate that Meziere has for the rotary engine. Did I = say I like bolt-ons? Take care. Paul Conner ------=_NextPart_000_0110_01C3B8AB.F6000260 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Russell=20 Duffy
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft

Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 = 11:04=20 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: More = wacky water=20 pump plans

Brilliant=20 Rusty - except that if you loose the belts you wont have much juice=20 left for the EWP.

The life = expectancy=20 (engine and pilot) is far longer without an alternator, than = without=20 water flow :-)

Seriously, I=20 think the advantage of the EWP might be removal of the mechanical pump = load=20 and weight. If I were going with EWP I'd get two and loose the = mechanical=20 pump. Go with a standard rad - it'll save you about the cost of the=20 second EWP, plus less load on the belts to keep you're alternator = running.

I already = have two EWP's,=20 and running both, with no mechanical pump is still=20 an option. Unfortunately, packaging is still an issue. Remember, = skinny=20 metal, not fat plastic :-)

Rusty (I hope I get the chance to = critique your=20 work <g>)

Hi, Rusty....regarding the skinny metal, I = assume you=20 are referring to the EWP. Do you have the Meziere pumps? It does = sound=20 logical to go with the two EWP's and dump the mechanical pump. Save = weight ,=20 have redundancy, and not rob precious horsepower from the engine. Just = a=20 thought from someone who hasn't done it yet, so consider the = source. I=20 do like the adapter plate that Meziere has for the rotary = engine. Did I=20 say I like bolt-ons? Take care. Paul=20 Conner

= ------=_NextPart_000_0110_01C3B8AB.F6000260--