X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.224] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.11) with ESMTP id 3434239 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:28:04 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.198.224; envelope-from=afm528@gmail.com Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so3357881rvb.7 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:27:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:reply-to:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:organization:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:content-language :thread-index; bh=C3hgPKY6jgYQ3rhl9pmAgAUkKRsOy7hZye1m/98kloQ=; b=EH0kYK24NCg6JpCcpHqmcx/71AbdF7iusRFteBCCIXUWLKzEtmFgAjth+wf2aA+/me rbJj7WOdSetxKXHkeyCCfMuo0x1x2ozpI2vScPEi1ii8QqvYc/ZQ3mgNmuih5r/lhIRp uMIBugVee8D2pSGloFBeI33bFR51vXCeYh7gs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=reply-to:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:organization :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-mailer:content-language:thread-index; b=Er3jbmuPf3/QR1F44Vxhywa5zk6m0jlUyZTcVchEuUmkH9q2AIalFFSmCuxtB5ejAL qTJyO5HcbkNkc4af+B+LSCXU42w9/30BODkokS4/yXw1jZV+7GKZt6P3VqzwLUtqVMHY asstVekAg0ao8ySP6v0jLjdtb9Bvmh2sn6dJo= Received: by 10.142.172.12 with SMTP id u12mr2582105wfe.26.1232407648462; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:27:28 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from Michaellaptop (c-24-5-148-84.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.148.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm9124679wfg.30.2009.01.19.15.27.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:27:28 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: From: Michael McMahon To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Paul Lamar's Simple Fuel Injection Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:26:33 -0800 Organization: moto.aero Message-ID: <0b0801c97a8d$5eaaa970$1bfffc50$@aero> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-language: en-us Thread-index: Acl6dMSa8Ni+NdhZS9ibrjA0LaQ4CwAGCN+w I had most of the same questions, specifically about testing and redundancy, and had pretty much decided to stick with my original plan to buy from Tracy, but was curious as to what others thought. After I buy my unit(s) from Tracy, I will happily join the chorus of people who think he undercharges. But AFTER! Thank you, everyone, for your well reasoned responses. I appreciate the time they took to write. Michael -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Whaley Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 12:30 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Paul Lamar's Simple Fuel Injection From my perspective (25 years in electronics) the injector driver circuitry would probably work, but as others have pointed out to what degree and with what service life. Secondly, it doesn't provide anything of use to most of us with EC2s/EC3s ... you still need to drive either 2 or 4 injectors and a fuel pump. The trickle-down gravity-fed fuel system, as a back-up was the most interesting aspect of the article to me ... that would really extend the airtime after an alternator failure if the fuel pumps and injectors could be turned off and some basic limp-home mode could be achieved. Otherwise we all need to know the battery life of our installations, add a second battery, etc. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of George Lendich Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 2:56 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Paul Lamar's Simple Fuel Injection Michael, Everyone's interested, but not enough information. PL is a master of the great ideas, but I don't know how many actually come to fruiton. George (down under) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael McMahon" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:07 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Paul Lamar's Simple Fuel Injection >I haven't seen any response on this list to the article that Paul Lamar > posted a couple days ago (below). I'm very interested in objective > discussion of merits and flaws, and there hasn't been much on the Rotary > Engines list. Has anyone read it? Any opinions? > > Thanks, Michael > >>>>> Not entirely done as I will be updating it from time to time depending > on your questions. >>>>> http://www.rotaryeng.net/simple-cheap-555.html >>>>> Paul Lamar > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html