Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #44774
From: Mike Wills <rv-4mike@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] another Muffler
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:13:00 -0800
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Quite the opposite Steve. I think the 3 Kt loss and looks (it actually looks better than most) is a fair price to payfor a relatively light, easy to construct muffler that works. My current "muffler" isnt a lot smaller and weighs about the same.
 
Questions:
 
1) Overall length?
2) Source for the dome and cone used in the construction?
 
Thanks,
 
Mike Wills
N144MW
----- Original Message -----
From: sboese
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:57 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] another Muffler

 

The following muffler description is provided purely as another data point in the muffler discussion.  I would suspect that not many of you would be interested in it due to its large size and external mounting.  I have had good service from it so far and it fits somewhat into my loosely interpreted Navy F6F Hellcat inverted paint scheme as a bomb.

 

The materials of construction are 0.032” thick 304 SS and the design is based on data in NACA Report 1192.  The weight is 9.6 lb and the diameter is 6.25 inches.  A SS heat shield is also installed between the muffler and the fuselage belly.  I have about 100 hours on this installation with no signs of deterioration of the muffler.  The engine is NA with exhaust splitters and is operated normally at density altitudes above 7000 ft which limits max power, although several hours of max power operation at DA lower than 5000 ft have not damaged this muffler so far.

 

I have been told that from the ground, the primary source of noise for my plane is the propeller.  I have landed with a C172 following me in the pattern and observers told me that they did not know I was there until I taxied in since they only heard the C172.  I have no quantitative data on the noise characteristics of my muffler system.  Inside the cockpit, the noise level goes from reasonable to unbearable if the muffler is removed.  This is purely subjective, of course. 

 

Not shown in the “muffler parts” image are three 1” x 1” angles made from the same material as the shell that connect the rear of the internal center tube to the front of the rear cone section.  The round flange in the center of the internal tube is a push fit in the shell and is not fastened directly to the shell.  A down turn also has been added to the outlet of the rear cone section.

 

From data in the “muffler test chart” image, the speed penalty of the muffler is about 3 kt.

 

The “muffler in flight” photo may be of interest in that it shows the heat distribution in the muffler with the dark areas being hotter.  This image is not current since the lower cowling has been modified and the engine cooling air outlet is now much smaller than shown in this photo.

 

Steve Boese

RV6A, 1986 13B NA, EC2, RD1A


--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster