Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #44704
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] FAW and the Phonoic gap [FlyRotary] Re: Muffler design (was 20B isssues . . )
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:42:10 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Ed Anderson wrote:
Ernest, keep in mind that the results you get with your sound recording may
not be indicative of what real exhaust pulse would give you.  The reason
-the exhaust pulse is a Finite Amplitude Wave - and they do behave
differently in reflecting and refracting than standard sound waves.  The math is not too intimidating {:>)

http://www.wikiwaves.org/index.php/Finite_Amplitude_Wave_Theory

  
OK.  You're just making fun at my expense now.

I'd be upset if that page wasn't so dang funny 8*)

Another factor that will affect the experiment will be the difference in temperature between the test I do with PVC pipes on the bench, and the steel that is in the rotary's exhaust.  I'll probably end up with five or six mufflers before I'm done, but I hear that is what you've got to do before you can be considered hairy-chested.

--

http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster