Al, do you recall the CFMs of your fan? And/or dimensions?
Bill B
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Al Gietzen
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008
12:44 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Cooling the
20B
Bill; your point is valid, but
I’ll take the liberty to add and clarify.
You will need to run between 75% and
100% in your plane most of the time! The rotary is well up to the task,
but you need to concern yourself with a totally different operation pattern.
Radiator wise the rule of thumb is a minimum of 2ci of radiator per HP for
piston engines, Rotaries like closer to 3 cubic inches per HP.
I actually find that with the extra
power of the 20B, cruising at about 50% is just fine. Unless you’re
in a hurry, since speed goes up by the cube root of power, an extra 25% +
dosesn’t get you that much. I can fly 200 mph at 9.2 gph, or 210
mph at about 11.0 gph. I tend to think it is not worth $7 of fuel to gain
3 minutes each hour of flight. The numbers for a Lancair or Velocity will
be different, but you get my drift.
But your right, of course; this is quite
a different application than racing. The limiting factor on cooling is
takeoff and climb. If you get that done, then you’ll start wondering how
to reduce the unnecessary cooling drag when cruising.
Be really careful about fans
in your plane. At the higher air speeds we see a fan can become a real
restriction. Also not many fans, (only the REALLY expensive ones), are designed
to be freewheeling in a 200 MPH airstream!
I use an auxiliary fan behind the
in-cowl radiator (which is handling most of the coolant heat load) in my
Velocity (rear engine, of course). It’s a 4-blade SPAL fan that covers
about 65% of the radiator. With the fan on I can sit and wait for takeoff
for long periods of time without concern. It gets turned off when I get
clearance. When I installed the fan, I did not notice any reduction in
the cooling ability in the air, so I conclude that it does not restrict the
airflow. The scoop inlet is about ¼ the rad area, so the air exiting the rad is
50 mph or less. I haven’t concerned myself about the fan spinning in
flight, and it has operated for about 60 hours of flying and doesn’t show
noticeable signs of wear. Although I should perhaps rig the relay to short
the fan terminals when turned off.
The fan has a secondary function which I
think is also important. I turn it on as I’m about to shutdown, and
leave it running a few minutes after shutdown. It definitely reduces the
in-cowl temps while things (especially the exhaust system) is cooling down.
Good for things like the coils and alternator.
Radiator wise the rule of thumb is a minimum of 2ci of
radiator per HP for piston engines, Rotaries like closer to 3 cubic inches per
HP.
Unless I’m overlooking something;
except for a bit lower BSFC (maybe 10 – 15%) there is no reason to
believe that a rotary takes any more cooling capacity per hp than a piston
engine. The split between oil and coolant heat loads is quite different. The
rotary puts close to 1/3 of the waste heat into the oil, whereas a piston
engine may be more like 10% or less. So although the combined heat rejection
requirement is a bit higher, the coolant side requirement (radiator) of the
rotary is actually less; the oil cooler quite a bit more.
As my installation has turned out, the
airflow through the oil cooler is less than anticipated, and the effectiveness
of the in-cowl rad greater. I typically see oil temps 20 to 40F higher
than coolant – so I’m about to face some re-plumbing to put in an
oil/water heat exchanger.
Al