Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #41378
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Low compression rotors
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:01:50 -0800
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

 

I have a 20B that I have taken the turbos off and will be using it in an

aircraft, a RV-10.  A friend of mine said that I should use the 9.7

compression rotors instead of the turbo rotors.  What say you all? 

 

I was very disappointed when I learned that Atkins did not switch out the 9.0 rotors for the 9.7 for my NA 20B.  My research turned up a plot of BMEP (same as power other things being equal) vs rpm for different compression ratios done by Mazda.  The effect depends on RPM – basically above about 6000 replacing the 9.0 with the 9.7 will have little effect, and the expected effect is about 4% around 5200 rpm.

 

If you are planning a 2.17 : 1 redrive; then I’d suggest making the change because the 5000 – 5500 rpm is important operating range.  If you go for the 2.85 ratio then it is probably not worth it.

 

Al

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster